Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
How much sway case law holds may perhaps range by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To take a look at this concept, look at the following case regulation definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents in the boy or girl don't approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they are able to do if they can Lower off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner must pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal has not nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight presented to any reported judgment may perhaps depend upon the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[seven]
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons acquiring their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
10. Without touching the merits of your case in the issue of once-a-year increases in the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment being made via the court of get more info plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to complete absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and the case shall be decided from the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar difficulty. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in implementing the law. This example of case legislation refers to two cases listened to while in the state court, for the same level.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are founded by executive companies based on statutes.